Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Marshall (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 04:22, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Marshall[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources to assert individual's notability. Initial search hits yield personal page, LinkIn, blogs, etc. --EEMIV (talk) 20:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Previous nomination was unrelated to this. No opinion on this nomination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mangoe (talk • contribs)
Delete No coverage at all except a blog "interview." EEng (talk) 20:48, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's a bit late to add, but he illustrates a lot of new discoveries (among them being the Sahara crocs and Eodromaeus) and gives our first view of these creatures. Crimsonraptor | (Contact me) Dumpster dive if you must 19:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is a BLP with poor sourcing. No bar to recreation if better sources are provided. Abductive (reasoning) 03:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.